I can't find figures though for their number of zones or max brightness after calibration. Some parts might change a bit but the gist of it should be the same. The LG sets are some of the best screens out there. For a full list of LG OLED TV’s that support LG AutoCal and this process see Portrait Display’s list here. Which tended to be not-so-modest in cost. For additional settings information, please consult the Common Problems and How to Calibrate pages. Several people I know that have tested both 'HDR' computer monitors and several modest-cost TVs have found that after calibrating for proper color, they couldn't get above 300 nits but on very few devices. The Calman shadow detail control for the CX/C1 Provides a new level of precision fore shadow detail that was never possible with C8/C9 brightness control. This was only something that happened on the C8 with specific firmware. Hmm.Īnd a 300 nit monitor isn't really enough brighter to be worth talking. LG does not disable near black dithering for C9/CX/C1 when using custom Calman 1D LUT. would be nice, my new BMPCC4k actually gets "lightly" into the HDR side of things, but. Yea, I've looked at the external gear for working with HDR. that's not counting his probably 60" TV for the clients to view, I would expect quite a few thou for that also. He's got probably $80,000 in monitors alone in his grading suite, the computer is easily another $12,000, then there's that $30,000 full Resolve control surface. I know one guy with a full Resolve setup on PC, completely certified as a DolbyVision "house", and did the D-Vision in-house training demos for how colorists need to work for their system. Out-of-the-box color accuracy is also distinct on the LG B8 vs C8 (due to the different number of color data points in the internal 3D cube look-up tables the two OLED TVs have), and so are HFR (High Frame Rate) capabilities (but only when the 4K signal includes HDR). have spent upwards of $60,000 at the minimum for their computer/monitor hardware. the monitors alone are running close to or above $30,000. They said at NAB that they are working on the HDR section, but we users never know until something ships that it's ready to go.Ĭurrently, to have an HDR setup that is at all acceptable to minimum professional standards, well. Prosumer "HDR" monitors/tv's are still rather low for actual output, have all sorts of variable things they throw into the signal to "assist the viewing experience" and therefore are rather difficult to have great confidence in.įor practice and "just the web". Yea, spendy, but the only monitors that are really good at HDR for 'grading' are upwards of $15,000 anyway. Reference/confidence monitor is always run from an external device.Īnd those are the external devices that have been tested by the Premiere team and work. Most colorists never work grading from a standard video card output. So colorists for example always work via internal/external LUT boxes to use highly calibrated profiles for specific color spaces on specific monitors with specific media. The specialty boxes/cards get past that, and hook into the file/signal before the OS processing of that file, bypassing all computer/OS ICC profiles and such. Standard video cards work from the signal given by the OS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |